Academic and Administrative Audit (AAA)

The quality of higher education institutions (HEIs) is increasingly evaluated based on well-defined ranking and accreditation parameters. To ensure continuous improvement, transparency, and accountability, this proposal outlines a comprehensive Academic and Administrative Audit (AAA) designed to assess institutional performance with reference to:

• NAAC (National Assessment and Accreditation Council)

• NBA (National Board of Accreditation) standards

• NIRF (National Institutional Ranking Framework)

Academic Audit

Curriculum Design and Delivery

  • Alignment with NEP 2020

  • Choice-Based Credit System (CBCS) adoption Industry-oriented and interdisciplinary curriculum

  • Faculty qualifications and development

  • Pedagogical innovations (ICT use, experiential learning)

  • Student feedback and outcomes

Teaching-Learning Process

Research and Innovation

  • Research publications and patents

  • Funded projects

  • Collaborations and MoUs

Evaluation and Assessment

  • Placement records and career support

  • Scholarships and financial aid

  • Alumni engagement

Student Support and Progression

  • Continuous Internal Evaluation (CIE) Transparency and fairness in assessment

Infrastructure and Learning Resources

  • Vision and mission alignment

  • Strategic planning and decision-making structures

  • Institutional autonomy and decentralization

Governance and Leadership

  • Classrooms, laboratories, and libraries

  • ICT facilities

  • Green campus and sustainability initiatives

Human Resource Management

  • Budget allocation and utilization

  • Financial transparency and auditss

Financial Management

  • Recruitment policies

  • Faculty appraisal and performance indicators Staff development programs

Quality Assurance Mechanisms

  • Functioning of Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC)

  • Policy documents and best practices

    Feedback systems

Administrative Audit

Methodology

Phase 3 - Evaluation and Reporting

  • Workshop on Accreditation New reforms (as applicable)

  • Data templates aligned with NAAC, NBA, and NIRF parameters (as applicable)

  • Faculty and departmental compliance reports

  • Departmental and administrative unit visit

  • Interaction with faculty, students, alumni, and administrative staff

  • Verification of documents and facilities

Phase 2 - On-Site Visit

  • Scoring based on audit rubrics

  • SWOC analysis

  • Comprehensive audit report with recommendations

Phase 1 - Pre-Audit Preparation

Audit Team Composition

  • Department-wise Audit Checklists

  • Faculty Performance Appraisal Templates

  • Student and Stakeholder Feedback Forms

  • Institutional Scorecards (based on NAAC/NIRF/NBA metrics)

Expected Outcomes

Detailed Academic and Administrative Audit Report

  • Institutional SWOC analysis

  • Action plan for quality enhancement

  • Benchmarking against top-ranking institutions

  • Readiness assessment for NAAC/NBA/NIRF

Tools and Instruments

External Experts from academia and industry

Internal Members (Director/principal,IQAC, senior faculty, administrators)

Representatives from alumni, employers, and students (for feedback)